This community is in archive. Visit community.xprize.org for the current XPRIZE Community.
Innovations in food loss and waste
Caroline
Posts: 47 XPRIZE
in Innovations
One of the problems we are exploring for this Impact Roadmap is food loss and waste. These happen along the value chain for a variety of reasons. As we all know, plastic bags are used as one way to store produce and maintain its quality for longer. But, there are many negative effects to excessive use of plastic.
I came across innovations that try to naturally preserve vegetable and fruit products to maintain quality and freshness for days. Apeel is an example.
Check them out and tell us what you think! Is this a feasible solution? Are there any similar options out there being used? At what scale?
I came across innovations that try to naturally preserve vegetable and fruit products to maintain quality and freshness for days. Apeel is an example.
Check them out and tell us what you think! Is this a feasible solution? Are there any similar options out there being used? At what scale?
1
Comments
On broader level, to store food products throughout the year, cold storage and dehydration are two technically possible alternatives. Cold storage needs high capital cost, continuous supply of electricity, various storage conditions for various food products and need to maintain food products at substantially lower temperature during storage time. It makes cold storages unsuitable for poor and rural communities having shortage of electricity, capital cost and skilled man-power.
Dehydration (drying) is relatively simple technology which can be practiced under open sky or by electrical and solar dryers. Dehydrated agri-animal products can be stored at room temperatures and used throughout the year. But, open sun drying can’t be practiced to dry all agri-animal products and suffers from issues of low nutritional product quality, Food microbial safety challenge colour-flavor loss, dust-insect contamination and 10-30% losses during drying.
Electrical dryers are complex, they need electricity and their operating cost is prohibitively high USD 0.2/kg for low value agri-animal products like fruit, vegetable and fish. Good solar dryers are complex, need electricity for fans, capital intensive and not designed in modular ways keeping women centric aspect.
The current scenario demands for technical intervention that is low capital cost, free of electricity, women centric modular design and easy to use that is aimed at converting post-harvest losses into value added products.
Solar Conduction Dryer (SCD) is a patented technology developed by the Indian organization-Science for Society (S4S Technologies), first decentralised food processing company and Institute of Chemical Technology (UDCT), based in Mumbai, India and tested under the guidance of National Institute of Nutrition (Government of India). SCD is the solar powered food dehydration unit that is overcoming loss and waste challenges by providing household level solar food dehydrator.
Solar dehydration increases shelf life of perishable fruits and vegetables from few days to one year, saving post harvest losses. SCD works with zero operating cost and retains 46% more nutrients than industrial dryers. The technology can dehydrate a range of vegetables, fruits, spices and marine products.
Farmers use SCD to dehydrate range of fruits, vegetables at farm level which they use for own consumption and S4S buys back the surplus dehydrated produce from farmers, processes and supplies them both to processors and end consumers via supermarkets and online platforms like Amazon.
S4S that targets worldwide market of USD 58 billion market of dehydrated products. On the other hand, S4S’s intervention increases farmers profit by 50-200%, reduces farm level post-harvest losses from average 25% to 5% and improves haemoglobin and nutrition level of farmer families by 36%.
It sounds like measuring waste is a good first step toward reducing it. If companies actually realize how much food, i.e., value, they're throwing away, they might do something about it.
I look at a $4 bag of spinach and wonder how much did the fertilizer that goes into producing it cost? Was it less than 10%, maybe 5%? I wonder how much energy went into making the bag and the cardboard box it came in, or into trucking it across the country. Is any of that considered waste?
The produce department of the grocery store where I work part-time has two small dumpsters that we throw maybe a quarter to a third of our compostable material into. It then gets hauled to a compost site hundreds of miles away in Ohio. The other two-thirds of our 'waste' is tossed into the trash. It could easily be segregated and composted as well but there's resistance from the staff who are already over-worked.
None of the waste we generate in the produce department is fit for human consumption. Very little would be fit for animals. However, we do generate a good deal of waste.
I can only speculate on why the material gets hauled hundreds of miles away for composting. Perhaps someone far away knows the value of good compost and is willing to pay for it. Perhaps someday there will be local growers willing to take it.
When properly composted and used to feed crops it isn't waste; it's food for worms that will make high-quality fertilizer of it.
An abundance of food implies excess. Abundance means more than is needed, which typically will generate some 'waste'. When I harvested about 150 pounds of tomatoes from a single vine I had more than I needed and gave plenty away, and some went into the compost pile and got fed to fruit trees, shrubs, and flowers in subsequent years.
Capturing nutrient runoff from compost bins, gardens, and farms and sending it back to the compost, garden or farm gives another opportunity for plants to absorb it.
Labeling fresh produce with harvest and expiration dates will drive attention and buying habits towards the harvest date, which means the food will last longer once it gets home, giving buyers more time to consume it and thereby generate less waste.
https://www-telegraph-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/07/09/victorian-idea-behind-stainless-steel-could-help-solve-worlds/amp/