This community is in archive. Visit community.xprize.org for the current XPRIZE Community.
Social Stigma Against Future-Proof Occupations
XPRIZE
Posts: 193 admin
Some occupations are more future-proof than others. The demand for elderly care, for example, is expected to grow, as is the demand for dog walkers and trainers, fitness instructors, hair stylists, and teachers. But there is often a social stigma against such occupations, and they're being labeled as “last resort” ones -- to be taken only by those who cannot find work in other, more reputable and better-earning occupations.
It is difficult to quantify to what extent social stigma affects potential workers’ decision to choose, or not to choose, an occupation. Given that demand for health-care workers, especially in elderly care, is expected to rise significantly, this could become a major problem.
It is difficult to quantify to what extent social stigma affects potential workers’ decision to choose, or not to choose, an occupation. Given that demand for health-care workers, especially in elderly care, is expected to rise significantly, this could become a major problem.
0
Comments
There are many good reasons for this stigma: low pay, physically demanding work, difficult hours, combined with high risk and responsibility. It has been my experience that much of the stigma comes from the low pay and the fact that these are female dominated jobs (not unrelated issues, of course)
I'd argue that stigma isn't the core problem: low pay is. Many of these jobs are paid by the state (esp outside the US) and governments need to be pressured to raise the pay bar on these professions. They have to be supported by the labour movement to organize and lobby for their rights to fair pay and decent, safe working conditions.
Labour unions are not a thing of the past worldwide, nor should they should not be allowed to become so -- they can play an important role in raising the profile and value of the work of those they represent.
Here in Canada, for example, teachers' unions are highly effective in raising the profile of their work and reminding the public of its value.
I worry we're seeing a divide in the labor market, though, between well-educated, well-paid professionals, who feel they don't need a union to bargain for decent wages and benefits, and lower-skilled, lower-paid workers, who are unable to unionize -- whether it's because they're technically qualified as self-employed, don't have the time, or are undocumented -- and who don't have a strong bargaining position individually vis-a-vis their employer.
@dshap54, you may also have thoughts on this. Please let us know what you think!