carlbozzuto · Consultant · ✭✭

The chamber idea for the first set of tests sounds good to me. Since this first test is more or less a proof of principle test, having a controlled chamber that is the same for all competitors makes … (View Post)

While a passive device would not use much (or any) energy, it's effectiveness would be poor. Unless air comes in contact with the device, it will not collect any particles. This has been pointed out … (View Post)

@TerryMulligan Area by itself is not a sufficient parameter. It must go along with velocity. In the example above, a flat surface that is contacted by air (or gas) may be only a low velocity device. … (View Post)

@marz62 There seems to be some confusion here. If we are talking about particulates, then miscellaneous sources are the greatest contributor to atmospheric concentrations in the US. EVs are not going… (View Post)

In the Carbon XPRIZE, we are only looking at operating cost. For early stage developments, capital cost is a wild card. In our discussions, we decided that complexity could be considered when compari… (View Post)